John McCain Adopts Barack Obama's Afghanistan Policy And No One Notices

Key to selling the Bush/McCain stay the course Iraq policy has been their insistence that Iraq is the "central front in the War on Terror." So, when Ambassador Crocker admitted in April that he was more concerned with al qaeda on the Pakistan/Afghanistan border than he was in Iraq, it shook the underpinnings of the entire rationale for staying in Iraq. That fragile facade has taken another hit this week with John McCain's admission that we do need to add troops to Afghanistan, which, not surprisingly, is a shift in position for Mr. McCain. The risk in such a shift in this case is greater than usual, however, because McCain is essentially adopting what has been Barack Obama's position for at least a year, reinforcing Obama's claim that he is the one with judgment to lead on National Security. Luckily for McCain, though, it's really only risky if the media reports it and, well, let's just say McCain hasn't lost his base, although at least The New York Times is admitting McCain's position represents a shift.

Mr. McCain said that both Iraq and Afghanistan were important battlegrounds and that the United States had the ability to fight in both places as long as it retained the will to do so. But on Tuesday, after saying for months that no additional forces were needed in Afghanistan, Mr. McCain changed course and advocated the deployment of an additional three brigades, or about 15,000 troops.

I'm not entirely sure why the Obama campaign is not shouting from the highest mountain that John McCain has adopted Obama's position on the issue but their strategy appears to be, instead, to use this latest McCain flip as an opportunity to continue the "confused" meme that they have introduced into the ether, for not only did McCain flip but his multiple strained explanations and clarifications that followed it made him look like quite the fool.

First the Obama campaign released a campaign memo yesterday that documented McCain's deep confusion (via Ambinder):

TODAY (MORNING): McCain Called for Sending Three Additional Brigades to Afghanistan and Suggests They Would Come From Iraq. According to a press release issued by the McCain campaign on Tuesday morning, McCain would announce in a speech that he now supports sending at least three additional brigades to Afghanistan: "The status quo in Afghanistan is unacceptable, and from the moment the next President walks into the Oval Office, he will face critical decisions about Afghanistan. ... John McCain Supports Sending At Least Three Additional Brigades To Afghanistan. Our commanders on the ground say they need these troops, and thanks to the success of the surge, these forces are becoming available, and our commanders in Afghanistan must get them." [McCain press release, 7/15/08]

TODAY (AFTERNOON): McCain Clarifies His Proposal On Increasing the Number of Troops, Saying They Could Come From NATO. "Speaking to reporters on his bus after today's speech, McCain indicated that he'd be open to those additional troops coming from NATO." [MSNBC, 7/15/08]

TODAY (EVEN LATER IN THE AFTERNOON): McCain Campaign Further Clarifies Proposal, Saying The Troop Increase Would Be Comprised Of Both NATO And US Forces. "McCain spokeswoman Nicolle Wallace said later that U.S. troops will compose some of the additional brigades McCain would send to Afghanistan, but not all of them. `Will we contribute? Of course we will,' she said." [Washington Post, 5/15/08]

Then there was an Obama conference call this morning during which  Barack Obama's Senior foreign policy adviser, Dr. Susan Rice, flat out referred to John McCain as "confused." From HuffPo:

"Up until a few days ago, his view was that we hadn't diverted any effort and attention from Afghanistan to deal with Iraq. That there was no need for additional American forces in Afghanistan. That all, in effect, was going well," Dr. Rice said Wednesday, adding: "Yesterday, he woke up and came to the sudden conclusion that indeed Afghanistan merited more strategic focus -- something the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has been saying for months -- and that we would therefore be willing to put in additional combat brigades. But then he got confused again, as to whether those needed to be American or NATO [troops] or some combination thereof."

It appears that the Obama campaign is continuing the sort of soft attack style that worked so well for him against Hillary Clinton but I agree with Rachel Maddow who said on Countdown the other night that she's afraid he's not being tough enough on McCain, especially since the media insists on giving him a pass. Josh Marshall has a must-watch video of the entire Afghanistan confusion and wonders, rightfully, where any mention in the media of the fact that John McCain, supposedly the experienced one, has now pivoted toward Barack Obama's position is.

The chirping crickets truly are deafening.



Display:


Is the McCain camp (none / 0)

still claiming that "confused" is a slam against his age?  That's just as silly as claiming "inexperience" is a slam against Obama's race.


by Blazers Edge on Wed Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:24 PM EST

Re: John McCain Adopts Barack Obama's Policy (none / 0)

Oh, they noticed.  It's just that it would be too damaging to the McCain campaign to admit that Obama's foresight and judgement is that much better than the old guy's, so it must be swept under the table.  Otherwise, God forbid this thing doesn't go down to a horse race with everyone huddled around their t.v. sets every night until the election night climax.  Why won't anyone think of the advertisers?

I am so disappointed in our media.


by hello world on Wed Jul 16, 2008 at 09:57:50 PM EST

I don't have time to research it (none / 0)

but during the primaries Obama advocating going into Pakistan to get Osama Bin Laden.   At the time conservative pundits suggests this showed Obama's lack of experience.

Then a couple of weeks ago the NYT reports that in fact the Bush Administration wanted to do the same thing, but was too caught up in bureaucratic formalities to act.

I wonder if McCain ever commented on this?  


by fladem on Wed Jul 16, 2008 at 09:58:01 PM EST

Re: I don't have time to research it (none / 0)

No, they haven't, and the Bush administration pivot was largely unremarked at the time, although it was almost immediate.  But this acknowledgement would be contrary to the popular narrative that Obama is inexperienced and unfit for the presidency, wouldn't it?  We should be ashamed of our collective infatuation with simplistic narratives, sometimes, if we truly want to resume our former role in world affairs.  This ain't going to be easy.


by Shaun Appleby on Wed Jul 16, 2008 at 11:01:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I don't have time to research it (none / 0)

Actually Obama proposed essentially invading Pakistan (entering a sovereign country without permission) to get Bin Laden, thus illustraing his lack of experience.

The bush administration is talking of doing nothing of the sort.  They are proposing going in WITH pakistan's blessing.

That's why no media is giving a damn about it, because they're advocating two different positions.  Bush's disastrous 'hold the course' position and Obama's idiotic "im a tough guy too" position.


If you want Unity, nominate a Democrat
by rankles on Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 08:33:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I don't have time to research it (none / 0)

That's factually incorrect, which isn't surprising coming from you.  He said exactly what he reiterated the other day which is that in the event of 'actionable intelligence' the US should act unilaterally in Pakistan to attack Al-Qaeda.  Within days both Hillary's campaign and the Bush administration both pivoted to that position.  Get your facts straight.

Furthermore you may have noticed at least one incident in the past few months, involving a Hellfire armed Predator drone, which elicited a protest from Pakistan on just that point.  Perhaps one of the reasons for your indefensible positions and incapacity for anything but polemic sniping in this forum is your complete disregard for anything but superficial narratives.  Goggle first, post second.  It's simple.


by Shaun Appleby on Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 11:48:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I don't have time to research it (none / 0)

My facts are spot on.  I remember when he said it, and no amount of his 'reiterations' will make me accept his rewriting of history.


If you want Unity, nominate a Democrat
by rankles on Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 05:52:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I don't have time to research it (none / 0)

Well, for anyone else I would take the trouble to re-post the whole public record and timeline, as I have done in the past, but for you, nada.  Just saying it is so don't make it so, I have rarely seen you make any citations or provide links for your assertions which, given your position, is hardly surprising.


by Shaun Appleby on Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 06:24:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Team Bush is also following (none / 0)

Obama's lead.


overthrow the government~participate
by missliberties on Wed Jul 16, 2008 at 10:29:56 PM EST

Lieberman in March 2008 (none / 0)

advocated a surge in Afghanistan.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con tent/article/2008/03/03/AR2008030302630. html  He also argued for a big push on NATO to help. Joe was right about this one.

A certain Senator form IL whose jurisdiction covers NATO was was completely inactive on this front.  His subcommittee never had hearings on exploring the NATO option.  Nor did he ask Biden to hold hearings.  In fact the only hearings he ever held were the routine confirmation hearings one has to hold.


by strongerthandirt on Wed Jul 16, 2008 at 10:35:33 PM EST

Supporting Hillary/ Linking/ Put Up Your Web Page/ (none / 0)

For those who wish to stay together in a long term commitment to the ideals and principles that Hillary Clinton has spent a lifetime promoting, http://Together4Us.com offers access for activists, funders, students, policy-makers and ordinary people to come together in support of each other and their goals for America. Please come to our website and join, use the code below to put our linked logo on your website and distribute our message and this code to all your network. Spread the word. We will be happy to put up a reciprocal link, your own co-branded web page on our site, or your own blog. Thanks so much, Gretchen Glasscock, Together4Us


by activist1 on Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 01:01:33 AM EST

Re: John McCain Adopts Barack Obama's Afghanistan (none / 0)

''I'm not entirely sure why the Obama campaign is not shouting from the highest mountain that John McCain has adopted Obama's position''.

I have been saying this for quite sometime. The only problem in the Obama campaign is their lack of seizing and controlling the media spin. If you might remember - Hillary Clinton always did very well in this.

The blame lies with Bill Burton. The communications director. He is simply out of his depth in that position.


Obama/Biden 08
by W126 on Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 05:29:58 AM EST

Stuff like this reminds me (none / 0)

That the election isn't just political gamesmanship. McCain is as lost as I've ever seen a Presidential nominee. Every day I'm shocked he even won the primaries.

On the other hand, it rocks to see Obama consistently getting it right, even from a year out.


by Neef on Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 08:26:40 AM EST

Re: John McCain Adopts Barack Obama's Afghanistan (none / 0)

So we progressives are now advocating a surge in Afghanistan?  Wtf?

OUT OF IRAQ, OUT OF AFGHANISTAN

Is this Obama's new politics of change?  Continuing the false 'war on terror'?

Stop trying to play tough, it's disingenuous and the electorate isn't going to buy it.  Just watching the video of this guy trying to act like a Hawk is making me want to throw up.

Maybe McCan is adopting Obama's policies, but whose policy is Obama adopting?

A surge?

Oh FFS, this is getting ridiculous. It's as if we were sitting around a campfire singing "all we are saying...is give the surge a chance..."


If you want Unity, nominate a Democrat
by rankles on Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 08:28:39 AM EST

false war on terror? (none / 0)

So I assume you oppose going after AQ?

What's the "true progressive" stance on losing part of New York?


by Neef on Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 08:52:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain Adopts Barack Obama's Afghanistan (none / 0)

True progressives need to start distancing themselves from Obama right now.  If you're worried about McCain being a third Bush term, maybe you should be worried about Obama being a third Bush term.


If you want Unity, nominate a Democrat
by rankles on Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 08:30:10 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.